SHOULD BE..............
Select messages from # through # Forum FAQ
[/[Print]\]

Bad Karma -> Other Games
#1: SHOULD BE.............. Author: Nam-Ranger, Location: GEORIGA, USA PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:16 pm
    —
....CC should be crouch all the time, that running ruins the game to me ..any game....
#2: Re: SHOULD BE.............. Author: TwoFour, Location: Owen Sound, Ontario, Canada PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 5:30 pm
    —
Hey Nam-Ranger,
                             We just had "Crouch Only" last wednesday on BF3 Server 1.
                             We'll try to get that going again for Close Quarters only.
                             I think it worked out pretty good. There was quite a few BK
                             members that enjoyed it.
                             Or, if we can get the funds, have BF3 "Server 3" Close Quarters as
                             Crouch Only....just a thought.
TwoFour
#3: Re: SHOULD BE.............. Author: Smok3Scr33n, Location: Ontario, Canada PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 5:39 pm
    —
Crouch wouldn't work on BF3 at all imo, the maps are too big for one. If you want to slow down the game; play the objective with you're squad and protect a capped point/area [aka camping].  Battlefield has many different play styles and is what makes the game so dynamic, trying to limit that would ruin it.

There is no need to run in CQDomination, the object is to cap and hold two points to win.  If your team is effective in doing so, you'll slow down the enemy or easily mow them down with coordinated team play, which is what BF is all about.  [TDM/SQDM aren't really BF gametypes, it was included only to attract the CoD crowd - But regardless the same holds true I believe]

I don't understand why anyone wants to change game dynamics, rather than adapt to them and counter? That's the fun to me, it's what gives the game so much of a replay factor, it makes every battle different.  

The mantra of the USMC > Improvise, Adapt and Overcome
#4: Re: SHOULD BE.............. Author: photek, Location: Port Richey, FL PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 7:58 pm
    —
Some people just arent having fun unless their shooting someone that walks slowly by their camp site. =)
#5: Re: SHOULD BE.............. Author: Tipster, Location: Chilliwack B.C. PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:32 pm
    —
The crouch only we had last Wednesday in BF3 Closed Quarters was just great. I believe everybody had a good time. i would like to play that again anytime.
#6: Re: SHOULD BE.............. Author: photek, Location: Port Richey, FL PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 9:44 pm
    —
We'll get a reoccuring event planned then!
#7: Re: SHOULD BE.............. Author: TwoFour, Location: Owen Sound, Ontario, Canada PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:33 pm
    —
Thanks Photek...looking forward to it.
And some others are as well.
By the way Thank You Smok3Scr33n for your input. However, I just talking about Close Quarters.

TwoFour
#8: Re: SHOULD BE.............. Author: Karow, Location: Taos Missouri PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 1:47 am
    —
I am sorry but bF3 just is not built for crouch even on CLose quaters maps.. I feel crouch in BF# the player movement is half the speed of black ops and just boring. My 2 cents. I think the event should stick to the boot camp server. I was all game to give it a try before but I have had a change a heart after playing a few rounds in crouch. I  agree with smokescreens position on this one. Protect one flag with a few and the others out trying capture the other two flags would slow the game considerably.
Bad Karma -> Other Games


output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT

Page 1 of 1